Topic what is the objective criterion to evaluate the good or bad of the cartoon-ppp13.com

Topic: what is the objective standard for evaluating the quality of animation? Although we all have the two thoughts of "the two dimension is perfect," but after all, we still live in reality, so as long as someone is there, there must be war. So far, any topic of topic has often evolved into a century of war with black. So is there a standard that can objectively evaluate the quality of the animation? In today’s topic, let’s talk. [view 1: seeing the results of various lists] is objective, but we can’t split a cartoon into a frame picture, and then go all in to study the details. So, the most important thing is how the work feels for most people. For example, one of the works in 80% people seem to God and when what is the "best animation TOP20" selection, these works are on the list. So, we have a reason to think that it is a very good work. After all, there may be a list of one or two military brush votes, but grab a list to see the work, so it can reflect its objectivity. There are so many works of this kind, such as "dunk high hand", "digital treasure adventure" and other childhood works, almost can not hear the voice of question. If so, it’s basically there, and there’s no technical content. In recent years, the works also include "gate of" "attack of the giant" etc.. Though there may be some controversies, but as long as supporters occupy the overwhelming majority, it is a good choice for those who have not yet touched them. [point two: let’s see if the work has enough connotation and whether the plot is reasonable) now, with the development of technology, many works have been able to enjoy the pleasing effect from the picture effect. So can we think of them as excellent works? There’s still a big question mark here. April – "a". Kaba Nellie, before the launch because the magnificent Promo burst table to give you a feeling of god. Which works after the broadcast, indeed in the picture, people are very perfect. But the ultimate reason is that the plot is not reasonable and the logic is insulting the IQ of the audience. There are many reasons why the plot is not good, but on the whole, a work without connotation and chaos is bound to win the support of anime fans. After all, the plot is attractive, and it’s the reason why we like to see animation after reading it. In fact, the quality of the painting is general, but the case of the plot is not a few. A lot of the black horse works in recent years are exactly the embodiment of this. Whether it’s a previous job! The Lord of the devil, or this year’s "blessing for the beautiful world!" "They don’t win by the style of painting, but when we click on our works, we can immediately be attracted by the story, reaching a point where we can’t stop. If it is possible to go further and reflect on its connotation, it will immediately rise from "excellent" to "classic". Why can the immortal works of Studio Ghibli, it is precisely in line with this request. So, it is very difficult to see people going to black "spirited away" the valley of the wind "and other works, because they do not even go to the extent of black. [view three: disobey the sales volume.) this is mainly for Japanese anime. In this country, the box office, the sale of the plate, and so on, often determine whether the work is a sequel or whether the work can be preserved. Although it seems too "real", it may not be more convincing than sales if you want to objectively evaluate the quality of the work. In general, a new fan of animation Blu ray discs are often priced at seven thousand or eight thousand yen. And the collection of a set of words, at least forty thousand or fifty thousand yen investment. Even in Japan, it’s not a small number. But if in such a situation, still can create a lot of success, then we have no reason to question the good or bad of the work. It’s a very ironic thing, in fact. At present, there are a lot of works on the Internet, and the click rate has even reached the point of horror. But as long as they look at their sales, they can only be described as "pitiful". The typical case "in Sakamoto, what are you doing here? ". Yes, it does attract a lot of people to click, but why don’t everyone want to buy a dish? Say white, it is not good enough! Well, this time will certainly have jumped out the taunt: what "infinite Stratos" no meaning at all, the plot very naive, not sold scary sales? Does it sell less slag than it? But let’s calm down and think about it, isn’t it the kind of work that has been brought about in recent years? The ability to lead the tide is an achievement in itself. Otherwise, after that, there are no more similar works that are stronger than it. Look at the movie box office. Whether you had not love Mr. Shinkai’s works but there is no reason to miss, "your name. ". Why? Because it is now the animation history of Japanese box office second, and is likely to go beyond the "frozen" works of Disney in the Japanese box office. If only can also be said to be ten two billion yen, the strength of powder ashes. But it has reached 10 billion level (much higher than Conan, duer A and nautical king). It has been recognized by the public. This poor box office than those who only have a group of figures, but the day shouting "God" idiotic powder works, is not more convincing? [View four: look at the evaluation of industry experts] Nowadays, the definition of anime fans is relatively wide. People who have seen one or two works can be counted, while those who have been mixed up for decades in the industry can also be anime fans. As a result, the differences in experience between each other will be particularly obvious. Even if it is the sless palace, but if it is the first contact of such a piece of work, it will not be full of the grooves. And if the audience itself is relatively young, plus the watch works is not enough, it is easy to stimulate the eye that works to attract, thus ignore a lot of really good. At this time, if there are industry experts, or senior animation fans on some of the works of Amway, often we should also listen to their views. After all, these experts do not simply say "ah, this work is a good look," but to analyze why it looks good. As a result, it is "reasonable convincing". If their views are in accordance with their own cognition, they will never lose their losses. [viewpoint five: I think it’s OK to watch it, and who will not be objective.] although many objective reasons can be found, but after all, we are still very sensitive to watch the works. Therefore, to be completely objective is simply a matter of Arabian Nights. Even if 100 people say "CLANNAD" is a masterpiece, but I just can’t accept the friends group issuing the story, so I can not buy it? And although there are so many people in the black "sin crown", I think the plot is very reasonable and my appetite, so I don’t think it’s very bad. This is why the selected works are often filled with disputed reasons in the inventory of some individuals. But if we calm down, we might as well consider this question: do you like to watch anime, in order to win the approval of others, or try to get happiness from it? After the imagination, all the struggles, all will disappear… Above from different angles, we talked about the question of "what is the objective standard to evaluate the good or bad of the cartoon". I believe you will have a lot of words to say, right? So I look forward to your answer. And yesterday the topic "why foreign children animation than homemade good-looking" also triggered a lot of anime fans comments. Now let’s see what the representative is. Click download Tencent animation APP, see more popular animation works [copyright notice: This article is exclusive Tencent cartoons, unauthorized, no reprint, otherwise it will be investigated for legal liability. ]

话题:评价动漫好坏的客观标准是啥虽然说大家都曾经有过“二次元是完美无瑕”的中二念头,不过毕竟看动漫作品的我们还是活在现实当中,因此只要有人,就必然存在着战争。目前为止,任何一部话题作品往往都会演变成吹跟黑的世纪大战。那么到底有没有一个标准能够客观评价动漫的好坏呢?在今天的话题当中,就让我们一起聊聊吧。【观点一:看各种榜单的结果】说是“客观”,不过我们不可能将一部动漫作品拆成一帧帧的画面,然后拼命去研究其中细节的好坏。因此,最重要的还是这部作品给大多数人的感觉如何。好比说,有一部作品在80%的人看来都是神作,而当有什么“最棒的动画TOP20”之类的评选时,这些作品也都能上榜。那么,我们就有理由认为它是一部非常优秀的作品了。毕竟一两个榜单还有可能是水军刷票,但是随便抓一个榜单都能看到该作品的话,那么恰恰就能体现出它的客观性了。这类的作品特别多,比如说《灌篮高手》《数码宝贝大冒险》等童年向作品,就几乎听不到有质疑的声音。如果有,那么基本上也是在那儿强行黑,显得并没有什么技术含量。而近年来的作品,也有包括《命运石之门》《进击的巨人》等等。虽然它们可能会存在一些争议,但只要支持者占据了绝大多数,那么对还没有接触过它们的人而言,去补番肯定是不错的选择了。【观点二:看看作品是否有足够的内涵,剧情是否合理】现在伴随着技术的发展,很多作品已经能够从画面效果上达到赏心悦目的程度。那么我们是否可以认为它们是优秀的作品呢?这里还是得打上一个大大的问号的。4月新番《甲铁城的卡巴内利》,在开播之前因为那种华丽到爆表的宣传片给大家一种神作的感觉。而作品播出之后,的确在画面、人设方面都做得非常完美。可是呢,最终并没有达到大家的预期,其根本原因在于:剧情不合理,逻辑性方面简直是在侮辱观众智商。剧情不好看还可以有很多的原因,不过整体而言,一部没有内涵、剧情混乱的作品肯定是无法赢得动漫迷们支持的。毕竟剧情足够吸引人,并且在看完之后能够让我们回味无穷才是我们喜欢看动漫的原因啊。实际上作画质量一般,但是剧情打动人的案例也不在少数。近年来的很多黑马作品恰恰体现了这点。无论是之前的《打工吧!魔王大人》,还是今年的《为美好的世界献上祝福!》,它们并不是靠画风取胜,而是当我们点开作品之后立刻就能够被剧情吸引,达到了一种“根本停不下来”的地步。如果能够更进一步,在内涵方面也有所体现的话,立刻就能从“优秀”上升到“经典”了。吉卜力工作室的作品为什么能够流芳百世,恰恰是符合这样的要求啊。所以,我们真的很难看到有人会去黑《千与千寻》《风之谷》等作品,因为——他们甚至达不到可以去黑的程度。【观点三:不服比个销量呗】这主要是针对日本动漫作品的。在这个国家,一部作品的票房、碟片销量等问题往往会决定该作品是不是能够出续集,以及作品能否保本。虽然显得太过于“实在”,不过如果想要客观评价作品好坏,也许没有比销量更有说服力的了。一般来说,一部新番动画的蓝光碟往往售价在七八千日元的样子。而收集一套的话,至少也是四五万日元的投入。即便在日本,这也不是一个小数字了。可若是在这样的情况下,依然能够创造不菲的成绩,那么我们就没有理由去随便质疑该作品的好坏。其实这也是一个非常有讽刺意味的事情。目前有很多的作品在网络上一片叫好,点击率甚至达到了恐怖的地步。但是呢,只要去看看它们的销量,那么就只能用“可怜虫”来形容了。典型的案例有《在下坂本,有何贵干?》。是啊,它的确能吸引很多人点击,但为什么大家都不愿意买碟呢?说白了,就是不够好呗!嗯,这时候肯定会有人跳出来嘲讽:那个什么《无限斯特拉托斯》毫无内涵可言,剧情无比幼稚,不也卖出了吓死人的销量吗?难道销量不如它的就是渣渣?但咱们冷静下来想想,最近几年那种轻改后宫浪潮,难道不是该作品带动的吗?能够引领潮流,本身就是一种成就哦。否则为何在那之后,就没有比它更强的同类作品出现呢?再看电影票房方面。无论你此前是不是喜欢新海诚的作品,但是都没有理由错过《你的名字。》。为啥呢?因为它目前已经是日本本土动画票房的历史第二,而且很有可能超越迪士尼作品《冰雪奇缘》在日本的票房成绩。如果只是十几二十亿日元,还可以说是骨灰粉们的力量。但达到百亿的水准(比《柯南》《哆啦A梦》《航海王》等国民级作品还要高出许多),就已经说明它得到大众的认同了。这比那些票房只有可怜的数字,却整天有一群脑残粉大喊“神作”的作品,是不是更有说服力呢?【观点四:看看业界专家的评价】如今动漫迷的定义比较广,看了一两部作品的人可以算,而在业界混了几十年的同样也可以是动漫迷。这么一来,彼此之间在阅历方面的差异就会特别明显。即便是无脑后宫,但如果是第一次接触这类作品的话,也不至于就觉得槽点满满。而若是受众本身比较年轻,再加上看的作品不多的话,就很容易被那种刺激眼球的作品吸引,由此忽视了很多真正的好片。这种时候,若是有业界专家、或者资深动漫迷对一些作品进行安利的话,往往我们也应该听听他们的看法。毕竟这些专家不会单纯只是说“啊,这个作品好好看”,而是去分析它为什么好看。如此一来,就显得“有理有据令人信服”了。若是他们的观点符合自己的认知,那么去补一补也绝对不会吃亏的。【观点五:我觉得好看就行,谁不服谁不客观】虽然说可以找到很多所谓客观的理由,但毕竟最终观看作品的我们还是非常感性的,所以说要做到完全客观,根本是天方夜谭的事情。哪怕有100个人说《CLANNAD》是神作,但我就是无法接受朋也群发卡的剧情,所以我不买账不行吗?而虽然黑《罪恶王冠》的人非常多,可我觉得剧情很合理、很对自己的胃口啊,因此我就不认为它的质量很差。这也就是为什么在一些个人向的盘点当中,入选的作品往往充满了争议的原因。不过如果我们冷静下来的话,也不妨思考这样一个问题:大家喜欢看动漫,究竟是为了赢得别人的认同,还是试图从中获得快乐呢?想通之后,一切的争斗,都将烟消云散……以上从不同的角度,谈到了“评价动漫好坏的客观标准是啥”的问题。相信大家也会有很多话想说吧?那么就期待你们的回答了。而昨日话题“为何国外儿童动画比国产的好看”也引发了很多动漫迷的评论。下面就看看其中的代表是怎么说吧。点击下载腾讯动漫APP,看更多人气动漫作品【版权声明:本文是腾讯动漫独家稿件,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。】相关的主题文章: